|
Who learns Latin?
How often?
What material is used? For all boys, the non-linguistic elements of the syllabus are based around four topics: The City of Rome, Roman Life, The Army and Roman Britain and Greek Mythology. Any relevant book, television programme or museum visit helps to reinforce the boys' natural enthusiasm for these subjects, especially mythology.
What about Greek? Why study Latin and Greek? To read the Latin and Greek authors in their original is a sublime luxury. I thank on my knees him who directed by early education for having in my possession this rich source of delight. Thomas Jefferson, 1800 The teaching of other, modern, languages does not always touch on the scientific analysis of language as mankind's principal tool. This is a void that the Classics teacher is happy to fill; and both Latin and Greek, which do not have to be spoken or created, provide excellent material. The fact that Latin and Greek are as dead as dead can be and have fairly rigid and transparent structures is a positive asset, making them ideal for anatomical research: they are not subject to the vagaries of linguistic development and transitory fashions. English has borrowed a vast quantity of Latin and Greek word-stems, and much is learned about the meaning, morphology, and spelling of those wordsip to the Humanities as Mathematics does to the Sciences: it reveals the structure underlying the expres. In particular, technical terminology is often classically based, and words seem less mysterious and easier to remember if their origins are understood. Reference is also be made to the rather different way in which French (or even Spanish and Italian, which the boys often encounter on holiday) has developed its heritage of Latin words. Such comparison leads to an awareness of linguistic evolution, of language as a living organism; in turn this engenders in the pupil a respect - and maybe an affection - for language that can only enhance his own application and appreciation of it. In sum, it could be said that Latin as a school discipline bears something of the same relationshsion of thought - the pupils will be learning more about language per se than about Latin or Greek themselves. In the past, much was made of the value of Classics in offering a training in mental discipline. Latin has indeed much to offer in this direction: the co-ordination of data and meaning, the concentration to make precise observations, the development of memory beyond immediate needs, the synthesis of apparent meaning and real sense, the creative yet conditioned use of language, and so on. Recent research has shown the clear structures of Latin to be of great help to children with learning difficulties, and it has not gone unnoticed that some educational authorities in the United States have seen fit to re-introduce Latin as a means to improving overall language skills. No Preparatory School Latin course will be complete in itself, since it is highly unlikely to provide pupils with, for example, appreciative access to the works of major writers such as Vergil or Horace. If it is to be part of a continuum that is furthered at Senior Schools, pupils must leave Caldicott feeling enthused by their Latin and Greek so that they will wish to develop their knowledge. Those who teach Classics here feel a responsibility to that continuum, and we are pleased to see that many boys are keen to pursue their studies elsewhere and thus reap the full benefit of their early labours. Both the Ancient Greeks and the Romans have much to teach us. Their institutions, from the mythological to the constitutional, were a serious attempt to solve human problems that face every generation. Much subsequent literature, even that written in modern times, presumes some awareness of classical antiquity, and sometimes self-consciously harks back to its themes and modes of presentation. There is a link, too, with the art world through, for instance, classical themes in Renaissance painting and the orders of architecture. Thus even the C.E. Latin and Greek courses supply a background as much for several other disciplines as for a better understanding of the modern world. To Conclude I spent much of my childhood in ancient Rome, with Livy next to Dickens on my bedroom bookshelves, and Virgil next to Buchan. For my contemporaries and elders, it is hard to know what it is like to have a perspective on the world that does not include Mucius Scaevola and Horatius, Nisus and Euryalus, Proteus changing form on the beach with his companion sea-creatures scattered about him. I feel as grateful as Thomas Jefferson about having had this opportunity, and wish that everyone else had it, too. AC Grayling, 2001 |
|